Home Links About us Contact us Jobs  

You are signed in as a Registered User
Man

MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS SIGN OUT
Technical Information
Eurocodes
Regulations & Codes
Case Studies
Membership
Bookshop
Training
News
Events
Suppliers Directory
Commercial Services
FAQs

Specifying timber species in marine and freshwater construction


Specifying timber species in marine and freshwater construction

Figure 1 Tropical hardwood groyne at Whitstable, Kent. Photo: TRADA Technology

Figure 1 Tropical hardwood groyne at Whitstable, Kent. Photo: TRADA Technology

This Wood Information Sheet (WIS) provides guidance on the technical properties of a number of lesser-used species (LUS) of hardwoods that may be used for marine and freshwater construction. It explains the advantages and risks of using timber in these environments and offers guidance on procurement. In order to produce cost effective, sustainable and long-lasting structures, specifiers must understand the hazards to which timber may be exposed and select the species with the most appropriate properties for the job. This WIS complements established design references, national or international standards and codes of practice.

Background

Specifiers have a key role in making informed decisions on the type of materials to be used in schemes. They must balance technical requirements with environmental and cost considerations. Historically, the UK construction industry has favoured a narrow range of ‘tried and tested’ hardwood timbers for use in marine and freshwater applications. Over-reliance on a small number of species is not compatible within sustainable forest management, as certain species are being over-exploited. This is likely to reduce the security of supply and cause inflationary price pressures in the future.

The marine and freshwater construction industry is generally reluctant to specify timber species without a proven track record. Greenheart and ekki (Figure 5) are the timbers most often selected as their strength and durability are well known. This conservative approach to specification is understandable as often the material cost of timber in a construction scheme is dwarfed by the overall construction cost. Furthermore, there is a common tendency to over-specify the technical properties of timber needed for a required end use, particularly if strength is critical. If other lesser-used species (LUS) of timber are to be accepted as substitutes, the industry must be provided with reliable data on the performance of these LUS.

Two obstacles to using LUS in marine construction to date have been:

  • There was limited information about the performance of these species in structural sizes. Information derived from laboratory tests on small, defect-free specimens is not accepted as a reliable indicator of structural performance.
  • Little was known about their resistance to marine borer attack. Natural resistance to decay-causing fungi does not necessarily guarantee resistance to marine borers.

The performance of a number of LUS has now been benchmarked against greenheart and ekki in a collaborative research project undertaken by TRADA Technology and H R Wallingford for the Environment Agency (Ref. 1).

The advantages and disadvantages of using timber in marine and freshwater environments

The marine and freshwater environments are challenging for all construction materials but timber suffers remarkably little from the effects of immersion in water and the salinity of seawater compared to, for example, concrete and steel. Timber has been used for marine and freshwater construction for centuries, a reflection of the properties that make it an attractive choice. Timber offers:

  • high strength to weight ratio
  • good workability
  • high tolerance to short duration loads
  • resistance to abrasion.

But timber, unlike concrete and steel, is susceptible to biological attack. However, this WIS enables specifiers to select timber that is resistant to attack by decay-causing fungi and marine borers.

Timber has the ability to withstand shock loads such as those caused by wind, waves or vessel impact better than most other structural materials. Its natural resilience has considerable benefits in coastal and river situations where impact loads often produce the highest stresses. In addition, the resilience and favourable strength to weight ratio of timber, and the relative ease of fabrication and repair, make it an attractive construction material for specifiers to choose.

Traditionally, the requirements for large section sizes, long lengths, high strength and good durability mean that tropical hardwood species have been preferred. These have the advantage, over softwood species, of much higher resistance to physical abrasion, impact damage and biological degradation by marine borers. The sustainable and responsible exploitation of a wider range of tropical hardwoods creates value in tropical forests and is a strong argument against the conversion of these forests to other non-forest uses.

Biological risks

This can be best considered separately under the two main types of environment covered in this WIS, namely fresh water and salt water.

Fungi in fresh water

Brackish water may be present in estuarine conditions, which may support attack by marine organisms.

The only biological hazard to timber in fresh water in Europe is fungal decay. Unless specifically referred to, the heartwood of the LUS detailed in this WIS is considered to be naturally durable or very durable in the context of attack by decay fungi. If timber is used externally in contact with fresh water, moisture content will rise and decay is certain to follow unless naturally durable or preservative-treated timber is employed.

An important qualification is that timber permanently and completely immersed in fresh water will not deteriorate due to the action of higher fungi (for example wet rot type fungi) as there is insufficient oxygen available for these types of decay fungi to carry out the process of biological degradation. However, soft rot decay can occur on the surface of timber completely immersed in fresh water and salt water, but its rate of progress is so slow that, on timber of any large dimension, its effect may be considered negligible unless the timber is in an abrasive environment.

At and above the water line, conditions may be suitable for terrestrial decay fungi and to avoid this it is advisable to specify a naturally durable timber.

Marine borers

Timber that is exposed in the marine environment below the high tide mark is subject to attack by marine bacteria, fungi and wood-boring animals. Of the three risks, marine bacteria and fungi have a comparatively minor role in the bio-deterioration of timber below the high tide mark. However, within the intertidal zone and above the high water mark, the risks associated with fungal decay in the marine environment are similar to those in fresh water, and to avoid these risks it is also necessary to specify a naturally durable timber.

Marine borers may cause severe damage to a timber structure over a comparatively short space of time.

According to research that TRADA undertook in the 1960s there are two main groups of marine borers in UK waters – shipworm (Teredo spp.) and gribble (Limnoria spp.). Gribble are ubiquitous, whereas shipworms are limited to the south coast and isolated estuarine areas along the west coast of the UK.

Records show that shipworms tend to be found along the south and south-west coast of the UK. However, no similar survey has been carried out since the 1960s and information on the current distribution of shipworms is scant. Given the improvements in water quality and sea water temperature rises that have occurred, it is reasonable to surmise that the risks associated with marine borers are likely to increase in the future.

An overview of gribble (Limnoria spp.)

Figure 2 Electron micrograph of Limnoria spp. Photo: L. Cookson, CSIRO

Figure 2 Electron micrograph of Limnoria spp. Photo: L. Cookson, CSIRO

The wood boring crustaceans found around the UK coastline are members of the Limnoriidae more commonly known as gribble (Figure 2). Unlike shipworms, adult gribble inhabit the surface and they are fully mobile. Although attack by this animal is superficial, persistent attack can result in failure of structural timbers. It can burrow an extensive network of galleries at or just below the wood surface which results in softening of the wood surface.

Gribble are small animals, just about visible to the human eye when timber is inspected in situ. Attack is distinguished by holes in the surface of the timber, with underlying galleries. Gribble are generally 2–4mm in length and are pale grey in colour. Ecological factors such as sea temperature and salinity can affect the reproductive and feeding activity of gribble. They tend to concentrate at the intertidal zone.

Gribble tend to be sensitive to their environment. They can cause significant damage in harbours and estuarine environments, where there is less risk of abrasion. However, where structures are exposed to the full force of the sea and where there is a high risk of mechanical abrasion, gribble find it difficult to establish large populations. This is because the abrasive nature of the environment destroys the galleries.

An overview of shipworm (Teredo spp.)

Figure 3 Example of Teredo spp. extracted from Barmouth viaduct Photo: TRADA Technology

Figure 3 Example of Teredo spp. extracted from Barmouth viaduct Photo: TRADA Technology

Shipworms found around the UK coastline are generally teredinidae (a family of molluscs). They have a soft worm like body (Figure 3) with two shells or valves at the anterior end of the animal which enable it to bore into timber.

The animal remains in the same tunnel throughout its life. Each tunnel is discrete and the animals avoid intruding into neighbouring tunnels as they grow and excavate into the timber. Even in timbers of limited volume, the shipworms will not emerge from the timber and will continue to bore alongside its neighbours until the timber is more or less destroyed and breaks apart. Usually, shipworms line their excavations with a secretion of calcium carbonate for protection. Growth rates can vary according to species and environmental conditions, particularly temperature. In warm waters some animals can grow in excess of two metres in length.

The posterior part of the animal maintains contact with the external seawater environment via a fine hole about 1–2mm in diameter. This hole is the only external sign that shipworms have colonised a timber component which makes surveying for shipworm infestation, using non-destructive techniques, extremely difficult in situ.

Non-biological risks

Above mid-tide level, the marine borer hazard is negligible, but on beaches with shingle banks or fast flowing rivers, mechanical abrasion caused by shingle or debris being washed against the construction can occur. This is an important consideration as abrasion can cause significant losses in cross sections of piles, planking and waling (Figure 4).

Figure 4 Example of abrasion on a shingle beach at Selsey Photo: TRADA Technology

Figure 4 Example of abrasion on a shingle beach at Selsey Photo: TRADA Technology

The mechanical abrasion resistance of timber in this situation is influenced by two factors: high moisture content of wood and soft rot attack. Since timber below high tide level has a high moisture content, its surface hardness and therefore resistance to abrasion are lowered. Soft rot decay can exacerbate surface softening and will accelerate loss of section caused by abrasion.

Timber sourcing issues

Since April 1st 2009, the UK Government’s timber procurement policy has required central government departments, their executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies to procure only timber- and wood-derived products that originate from either independently verifiable legal and sustainable or FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade) licensed, or equivalent sources. As an alternative, contracting authorities may use recycled timber. The policy requires evidence of chain of custody (movement of the timber through the supply chain from the forest source to the end product) and that the source of the timber is legally and sustainably managed or FLEGT-licensed

All timbers detailed in this WIS could be sourced with evidence of legality, sustainability and chain of custody (FSC certification in all cases) at the time of carrying out the research.

Further information about the UK Government approach can be found at www.proforest.net/cpet.

Specifying and using timber in marine and freshwater environments

The specification process for marine and freshwater timber structures should consider service life and the dominant risks that exist at a given location. These include the risks of attack by marine borers, abrasion, attack by decay-causing fungi, or any combination of these factors occurring over the life of the structure.

The information in this WIS demonstrates that it is possible to specify timber according to the significant hazards encountered in service. For example, if the primary hazard is one of abrasion, then marine borer resistance, particularly gribble resistance, may not be as critical as abrasion resistance.

Timber properties

Tables 1 and 2 summarise the performance of greenheart and ekki and a range of LUS when benchmarked against greenheart and ekki.

Use Classes

The guidance in this WIS specifically covers timber for construction in Use Classes 3, 4 and 5 as defined in BS EN 335 (Ref. 4) where Use Class 5 is the most hazardous.

Use Class 3 is defined by this standard as: “A situation in which the timber is not under cover and not in contact with the ground. It is either continually exposed to the weather or is protected from the weather but subject to wetting.”

The timber is exposed to decay fungi that can cause pockets of rot.

Examples include: decking (including pontoons), parts of a jetty structure above the Mean High Water Springs (MHWS) level or 1–2 year water level for rivers.

Use Class 4 is defined by this standard as: “A situation in which the timber is in contact with the ground or fresh water and is permanently exposed to wetting.”

The timber is exposed to decay fungi and soft rot fungi which exacerbate erosion.

Examples include: moorings, navigation structures, parts of landings, piers, jetties and stages that are immersed, fenders, lock gates and slipways.

Use Class 5 is defined by this standard as: "A situation in which the wood or wood-based product is permanently exposed to salt water."

The timber is exposed to decay fungi, that can cause internal pockets of decayed timber, soft rot fungi and attack by marine borers.

Examples include: groynes, slipways (incl. decking), parts of landings, piers, jetties and stages that are immersed, fenders and lock gates.

Table 1: Performance of five lesser used species benchmarked against greenheart and ekki

Species Resistance to decay fungi Resistance to shipworm1 Resistance to gribble2 Strength class Density (kg/m³) Abrasion3
Greenheart Very durable Resistant Resistant D70 1080 Resistant
Ekki Very durable Resistant Resistant D70 1080 Better
Angelim vermelho Very durable Comparable Comparable D60* 1082 Comparable
Cupiuba Durable Comparable Better D50* 822 Worse
Eveuss Very durable Comparable Worse D50* 1019 Better
Okan Very durable Comparable Comparable D40* 998 Comparable
Tali Very durable Comparable Comparable D35* 815 Better

Refer to Environment Agency Technical Report SCO70083 (Ref. 1) for more detailed results summarising the respective trials

Strength classes obtained from BS EN 1912: 2009 (Ref. 2)

* Strength classes allocated in accordance with BS EN 338: 2009 (Ref. 3)

1 Benchmarked against ekki and greenheart. Greenheart and ekki perform comparably.

2 Benchmarked against ekki because its performance is slightly inferior to greenheart

3 Benchmarked against greenheart because its performance is slightly inferior to ekki


Table 2: Performance of non-strength-critical LUS benchmarked against greenheart and ekki

Species Resistance to decay fungi Resistance to shipworm1 Resistance to gribble2 Abrasion3
Basralocus Very durable Comparable Comparable Comparable
Cloeziana Durable Worse Comparable Comparable
Dabema Durable Worse Comparable Comparable
Garapa Durable Comparable Comparable Comparable
Massaranduba Very durable Comparable Comparable Worse
Mora Durable Worse Comparable Comparable
Mukulungu Durable Worse Worse Comparable
Niove Durable Worse Better Comparable
Piquia Durable Comparable Better Comparable
Sapucaia No data Comparable Comparable Comparable
Sougue** Moderately durable Comparable Comparable Better
Tatajuba Durable Worse Comparable Comparable
Timborana Durable Comparable Comparable Comparable

Refer to Environment Agency Technical Report SCO70083 (Ref. 1) for more detailed results summarising the respective trials

** moderately durable timber and should only be used for groyne planking

1 Benchmarked against ekki and greenheart. Greenheart and ekki perform comparably.

2 Benchmarked against ekki because its performance is slightly inferior to greenheart

3 Benchmarked against greenheart because its performance is slightly inferior to ekki


Structural design

The sizes of the timbers and design of connections should be determined by a structural or civil engineer on the basis of appropriate calculations. The design should also be checked to ensure that it is appropriate for timber. For instance, the design should not create water traps or restrict the timber’s shrinkage or swelling to the extent that large cracks form.

The technical properties detailed in Tables 1 and 2 provide support for specifying and using these LUS for marine and freshwater construction in the UK and elsewhere.

Situations where strength is critical

Five LUS have been allocated to strength classes, as detailed in Table 1, on the basis of test results for bending strength, bending stiffness and density. The strength classes provide values that may be used in design using Eurocode 5 (Ref. 5).

These timbers (angelim vermelho, cupiuba, eveuss, okan and tali) are illustrated in Figure 6. They may be used as alternatives to greenheart and ekki, provided their resistance to marine borer attack and abrasion, where relevant, and their strength properties meet project requirements.

The strength class allocations for these five LUS were derived from timber tested at a moisture content close to that likely to be found in service for Service Class 3 (SC3) where the average moisture content is greater than 20% (timber immersed in the marine and freshwater environment will have a moisture content in excess of 20%). No correction was made for this high moisture content during the strength testing programme. Therefore, structural engineers need not apply any of the strength reduction for SC3 in their designs when specifying angelim vermelho, cupiuba, eveuss, okan and tali. However, this must not be taken as advice that the strength values may be increased if the expected Service Class is SC1 or SC2.

Situations where strength is not critical

If strength is not critical, a longer list of 13 LUS (Table 2) may be suitable for marine and freshwater construction applications. These timbers exhibit varying degrees of resistance to marine borers and abrasion. Their suitability will need to be assessed on a project-specific basis.

Promoting the lesser-used species

The specification and use of the LUS detailed in this WIS requires a holistic approach. In addition to marine borer resistance, abrasion resistance and strength data, other factors such as price, section sizes, shrinkage, movement in service, workability and machinability characteristics, and delivery times may influence choice.

TRADA recommends that specifiers select timbers by considering functional requirements and key risk parameters in order to ensure that the lesser-used species are considered alongside ‘tried and tested’ timbers such as greenheart and ekki.

Figure 5 Hardwoods with a proven track record in marine and freshwater construction Photos: TRADA Technology

Greenheart

Greenheart

Ekki

Ekki

Figure 6 Lesser-used species with good structural performance Photos: TRADA Technology

Angelim vermelho

Angelim vermelho

Cupiuba

Cupiuba

Eveuss

Eveuss

Okan

Okan

Tali

Tali

References

  1. 1. Environment Agency. Technical Report SCO70083. Assessment of the durability and engineering properties of lesser known hardwood timber species for use in marine and freshwater construction. Williams, J.R., Meaden, M. and Simm, J. eds. TRADA Technology, 2010. Available to download at www.trada.co.uk/techinfo/research
  2. 2. BS EN 1912:2004+A4:2010 Structural timber. Strength classes. Assignment of visual grades and species. BSI
  3. 3. BS EN 338:2009 Structural timber. Strength classes. BSI
  4. 4. BS EN 335-1:2006 Durability of wood and wood-based products. Definitions of use classes. General. BSI
  5. 5. BS EN 1995-1-1:2004+A1:2008 Eurocode 5. Design of timber structures. General. Common rules and rules for buildings. BSI

Look for similar articles by category

                                       
  Site map Terms & conditions Privacy policy

© and Database Rights TRADA and BM TRADA Group Ltd 2002 - 2008. All Rights Reserved

Timber Expo Launch
TTJ Awards
BEST
EC5 workshops
Wood Awards 2010